Showing posts with label GSK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GSK. Show all posts

Friday, August 10, 2012

When sweet dreams become nightmares (Musings on health officials & Big Pharma)

Updated 17 Sept. 2012

August's blog is stimulated by disappointment, even disgust, with those associated with health care who turn out to be dishonorable, i.e., liars and thieves who put their welfare above those they serve.

Would be nice to write a cheery, upbeat theme for the dog-days of summer (in northern hemisphere), but recent news items are enough to make me, and I'd guess most readers, gag.

Regardless of your location, the blog has much food for thought because the issues are global. Honest, you could not make this crappy behavior up.

The title comes from a song by Annie Lennox, a Scottish singer-songwriter and political activist.

ALBERTA, CANADA
These events happened in my backyard but I know it could happen where you live and probably has.

The gist of this sad tale is that Allaudin Merali, hired by Alberta's provincial health system (AHS) as CFO in May 2012 at a salary of $425,000, resigned in July after a CBC reporter broke the story of his exorbitant expense claims ($346,208).

The expenses occurred during his previous employment with Capital Health (before AHS was created) as its CFO (Jan. 2005 - Aug. 2008). For interest, a CFO's responsibilities.

Is Merali an outlier? I suspect not. This type of abuse had to be normal for the health system or it would have been flagged and stopped.

The health region's CEO kept signing off, and who knows for how many others pigs at the trough. You know, all the senior political cronies (oink! oink!) our provincial government appointed to make decisions for us, invariably with minimal or no input from health professionals in the trenches.

To think that my colleagues and I would never include liquor in our expenses (makes sense as it's discretionary spending and not allowed). We'd fly the cheapest airfare, as required, despite inconvenient schedules like red eye flights. Being good employees with integrity, we'd meticulously  use time-inefficient airport shuttle buses so as to keep our expenses minimal in the interest of fairness to those paying.

Not this Merali dude, though. And to top it off, after losing his job in 2008 (when Alberta's health system was reorganized), he received $1 million in severance and a $1.6 million retirement plan over 10 years ($13,303/mth).

17 Sept. 2012: AHS chair whines on cost of audit & info requests into executive expenses (Ya gotta love these guys)

Pretty sweet, eh? (Said the Canuck with a grimace, not a smile.)

GRUESOME DETAILS
News items:
Fascinating stuff. Many routine charges (e.g., conference registration), but who knew the nobs also charge for booze? Fact is, Merali, earning a substantial salary, charged for everything. I bet if he bought a small packet of kleenex or gum drops at the airport he'd have charged them. 
BOTTOM LINE
It's a saga of greed and privilege rampant at the highest levels of a health care system. Leaders are supposed to model expected behavior and instill confidence in a shared vision to benefit all. Gak!

The behavior of this particular Alberta health official falls so short. But he cannot have been alone. If you or I behaved as Merali did (and who knows who else at the top did), we would not, indeed could not, get away with it. Adding to the odious conduct, the situation indicates a double standard that undermines the entire system.

At the same time as Merali was at the trough, Alberta's health professionals struggled to do more with less, as did the entire health care system (too few staff, too few beds, too few long-term care facilities, etc.)

During this time (2005-8), when lunching at a nearby hospital I'd occasionally talk to laboratory technologists who were former students. When asked how things were going, they'd invariably reply anything from not good to brutal.

My next question was, "What's the main issue?" The reply was always a variation of, "Too few staff." So few, that existing staff could not take holidays as there was no funding for part-time or casual staff, even if suitable replacements existed.

Once a PhD lab director stopped by and looked positively ashen. In conversation he noted that what was happening (Alberta's restructuring from multiple health entities to one) was even worse than the 1990s when cost cutbacks were severe and uncertainlty reigned:
One lab technologist told me that they had a gag order not to talk to outsiders on threat of firing. If Alberta's physicians were bullied, you can bet everyone in the system was.

Charming. What a way to run a health system.

As cost restraints prevailed in the trenches, Merali (and who knows which other senior health officials) was living the high life at tax payers expense. Dining at the most expensive restaurants, getting a phone installed in his Mercedes (Who does this in the age of cell phones?), repairing his Mercedes. It must have been hard to rack up almost $350,000 in expenses over 3 1/2 years.

Is this narrative unique to Alberta, Canada? I doubt it. My take is that it's happening somewhere near you, but you may not know about it yet or ever, unless you have professional reporters who can investigate.

And we know what's happened to real reporters in print journalism in the Internet era. Sites that compile news have gutted the system and users expect news and everything else on the Net to be free.

BIG PHARMA
Big Pharma presents a similar tale of corruption, indeed a worse one. Seems reports of bribery and putting corporate benefit above vulnerable patients never stop.
GSK admitted misbranding 2 drugs and withholding safety data for another:

GSK had total disregard for the health of vulnerable people they were supposedly helping - knowing their actions could cause harm, but doing it anyway for self-advantage.
If I did that as a health care professional, I'd be guilty of criminal negligence.
With USA regulators clamping down, drug firms seem to have stopped (I say seem because who knows) perks for doctors and similar bribery. But not so in developing countries.

Pfizer's conduct seems to be normal for Big Pharma. 8 of the 10 biggest firms on the planet mention costs for corruption charges as a risk.

Big Pharma's behavior is similar to tobacco firms selling cheap disease-causing cigarettes in developing countries, not caring about those who die. With a decrease in sales in industrialized nations, multi-national companies in the UK and USA decided to spread smoking to developing countries:
Or take the case of our Canadian government (the Harper government as they like to be called), which for a few jobs in Quebec in the asbestos industry, refuses to support a global ban on the well documented killer, asbestos:
Shameful. Disgusting. Sickening. Criminal. Tobacco companies, Canada's Harper government, and drug companies  - all behave similarly.

MUSINGS
The spectre of senior health officials in my province and their culture of privilege is one thing. I expect it's the same whether in countries with national health care systems (most of the world) or the USA, where private health competitors do whatever it takes to survive and make profits.

What also gets me is that I know several industry reps who are decent individuals. It's hard to think that they work in an environment where bribery and lying are normal. But to think otherwise would be naive. Sadly, evidence to the contrary abounds.

When first entering the health professional many years ago, I had dreams of helping others and being one of the good guys. Definitely a profession that was a notch above used car salesmen, who had a well deserved reputation for lying and cheating customers. But I've learned that health care is also a business, and a nasty, nightmarish  one.

What to do? Focus on the positive in daily work, shine a light on the rats among us, and hold those who tarnish the field to account, a lifelong challenge. Or say nothing, do nothing, be nothing?

FOR FUN
Can there be any fun after such all too real events? Of course. First, a great song that outlines the reality described above:
  • Sweet dreams (Annie Lennox) Some of them want to use you...Some of them want to abuse you...
Next, a slightly sappy 1960s ditty that expresses what we hope for all those involved:
Lastly, to end on a positive note, and just because I love the song and its fabulous artist appears at the Edmonton Folk Festival this weekend:
As usual, the views are mine alone. Comments are most welcome BUT, due to excessive spam,  please e-mail me personally or use the address in the newsletter notice.  Great comments below - be sure to read them.




Sunday, July 08, 2012

Got a feeling (Musings on blood doping)

Last updated 10 July 2012

This blog's idea arose because the Olympics is almost upon us (2012 London Olympics, 27 July - 12 August) and there is much talk about the latest laboratory tests to detect cheats. 

Moreover, this year Big Pharma is involved with much fanfare and the specific giant pharmaceutical company (GlaxoSmithKline) has been in the news recently for quite a different reason (more below).

The title comes from a song by the US / Canadian group, The Mamas and Papas.

BLOOD DOPING
The London Olympics has revived news about drug cheats and blood doping, e.g., How do the sports compare.

Blood doping has also been in the news because Lance Armstrong, 7-time Tour de France winner is charged with doping by the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA).
Blood doping boosts the number of RBC to enhance athletic performance and is rampant in endurance sports such as long-distance cycling and cross-country skiing. It's been done using erythropoietin (EPO), homologous and autologous blood transfusions. Autologous blood doping has been hard to detect because dopers receive their own red cells.

MUSINGS
As long as sports is big business with mega-bucks on the line for winners, cheating will exist. Cheating at the Olympics seems particularly odious given Olympic values.

But winning a Gold Medal is often worth $millions to athletes in commercial endorsements and sponsorships.
In contrast, the money that some athletes earn from their countries is small change.
Canada is late to the game and a cheapskate:

But the $millions in endorsements help explain why some athletes cheat and risk detection, e.g., Canada's sprinter Ben Johnson, who was stripped of his gold medal at the 1988 Seoul Olympics and whose physique revealed all.

As to professional athletes like US baseball slugger Barry Bonds,  you only need to look at their physiques, especially before and after photos to know who the steroid cheats are, as well as the 'steroid rage' that some players exhibit. 

Same with USA NFL football. Some of those dudes look loaded with steroids or human growth hormone and tests should detect the cheats. Also see


As a soccer fan (aka football outside NA), I've wondered if players take performance enhancing drugs but evidence suggests otherwiseespecially for players like Fernando Torres, whose physique hardly screams performance enhancers like steroids or HGH. 

Not necessarily true for 'recreational drugs' like cocaine, though. With young footballers earning mega-millions in salaries and sponsorships, it's bound to happen.
LONDON OLYMPICS 'BOFFINS'
But back to The Olympics. The London Olympics will showcase the ongoing battle between the cheats and those who aim to catch them.
It turns out that laboratory equipment for the new Olympics testing facility was supplied by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) at a cost of £20 million:
This King's College London site features complimentary words on GSK by David Cowan, Director of the College's Drug Control Centre and a video by GSK:
Here's the top boffin explaining a term that many countries have implemented to help prevent cheating:
Interestingly, GSK was in the news last week for a very different reason, settling the largest health care fraud case ever:

...[GSK]... admitted to misbranding the antidepressants ...and marketing them for uses not approved by the ... FDA, including the treatment of children for depression and the treatment of ailments such as obesity, anxiety, addiction and ADHD.
In some cases, the company did so despite warnings about possible safety risks from the FDA, such as an increased risk of suicide for children under 18 taking antidepressants.
It also admitted in the settlement that it did not provide the FDA with safety information that indicated its diabetes drug ...might cause heart problems. The drug was eventually pulled off the shelves in Europe and its sale restricted in the U.S.
Its CEO says GSK instituted reforms & learned from its mistakes. 
Seems everything is spin and PR these days, certainly in politics, but also in the world of Big Pharma. Good publicity from Olympics testing lab will help put a shine on GSK and erase last week's deadly headlines about the company's incredible, unethical proven past actions.

Bottom Line
As a bloodbanker I especially hope that autologous blood doping can be stopped. And as a football / soccer fan, whose players run up and down the pitch for 90+ minutes, I hope that none are into blood doping or other cheating.

But I've got a feeling....

FOR FUN
How I feel when my sports heroes are caught out by drug tests:
  • Got a Feeling (Mamas and Papas) Somewhat ironic as this group, whose songs I love, were into drugs as were many in the 1960s.
  • Dancing in the Street (Because I like the song and Mama Cass's voice, and it's summer in the northern hemisphere)
FURTHER READING
As always, the views are mine alone. Comments are most welcome BUT, due to excessive spam,  please e-mail me personally or use the address in the newsletter notice.